SEO Company Home Page 1.877.867.1030
client login
contact us
site map
seo company seo software seo services seo training case studies support seo blog
search
Click here to download SEO Studio Free Edition

How to get Google grouped double or even tripple listing results

 March 29, 2010   Comments: 0

I had interesting question about how to identify the best sub page for a specific keyword phrase to target for link building.

There are really two easy ways to do this, the first one is to enter into Google the site command followed by your website URL and the keyword phrase in quotes.

Here is how:
Site:www.mysite.com “this is the target keyword”

Google will respond by listing the best pages that match your query on your site. The first page listed most likely will be a sub-page not your home page. Either ways you have just found your best matching sub-page in to target for link building.

The second option to find the best suited page for further optimization and link building is to increase the number of pages Google displays by clicking on the Advanced Search options and increase Results Pages to 100.

If your site is already in the top 100 you should see two listings, 1 for your home page and one for a sub-page Google picks as the most relevant. This sub-page should match the page you will find by executing the Site search command in the previous step

You can further enhance the sub-page by optimizing the title, add heading tags and optimize the content by sprinkling a few variations of the keyword around. You can also add internal links to the sub-page from other related pages from within a suitable content.

Add this blog post to: Add this link to your Delicious accountdel.icio.us Digg this storyDigg this Add this link to your Google accountAdd to Google

Faking Orgasm vs Fake Google PageRank (PR)

 February 13, 2008   Comments: 0

Fake PageRank

Question: What does a woman faking an orgasm have in common with web masters buying fake Google PageRank text links?

Answer: They both get screwed at the end

The famous movie scene from When Harry met Sally with Meg Ryan faking an orgasm in a dinner is etched in every man’s mind as stark reminder that if a woman wants to make a guy think he is the ultimate lover, she can easily do it. There is a new breed of cyberspace fakers out there that want you to believe you are getting a good deal by buying a high PageRank text link from their site. The problem is, it’s very easy to fake PageRank and you may be the next fool buying a fake PageRank link. Although Google came out strong against sites openly advertising and selling text links, the message is still not getting through. People continue buy paid text links as the word about Google link driven algorithm is reaching the masses.
Google knocked down the PageRank of many sites selling PR or selling paid blog post reviews in October 2007. The publishing sites selling paid reviews on Payperpost.com and Reviewme.com got hit especially hard with PageRank drops and in some cases a complete wipe out of their PageRank.

Buying Google PR

Web masters had been buying links with high Google PageRank since around 2002 to gain higher PR and also higher ranking. Although Google had changed their algorithms many times over the years to decrease the importance of the Google PageRank in their ranking score and give higher weight to other factors such as links from authority sites and inbound anchor text, the PR is still an important consideration for many website owners pursuing high rankings. If you take a look at the top ranking sites for even moderately competitive terms you will find the average Google PageRank of the top 10 sites is still around 4-5, which is pretty high. These days it’s becoming harder and harder to obtain paid links that are flying under the Google paid link detection radar and when this happens opportunity knocks on the doors of fly-by-night operators.

Faking Google PageRank

What makes the situation even worse is sites pretending to sell links on high PR sites are using nothing more than simple 301 redirects, which can be easily replicated by anybody. There are a few ways a fake Google PageRank can be achieved. All methods require server side scripting to detect if the page being requested is a human or robot. We can find out if the page requestor is human or robot by checking for the user agent specification in the request header of the request or the IP address where the request is originating from.

The code in PHP would look something like this to detect the Googlebot and than redirect it to a page with high PR page, in this example MSN.com.

<?php
if (strstr($_SERVER[’HTTP_USER_AGENT’], “Googlebot”)) {
header(”HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently”);

// Insert the site whose PR you want to fake
header(”Location: http://www.msn.com/“);
exit;
}
else {
// Insert the URL of your real site here
header(”Location: http://www.myrealsite.com/“);
exit;
};
?>

How to detect fake PageRank

The simplest method to detect fake PR is to check the Google cached version of the page. You can do this by entering the URL into the Google search box and hitting enter. The search results should display the same URL as the one you have entered into the search box. If the PageRank is fake Google will return a different URL in the search results.

The Google cache command can also be used the same way. Enter cache:www.possiblefakeprsite.com into the Google search box and if the site’s PageRank is real you will see an identical version of the page displayed otherwise you may get a page not found message from Google or a completely different page altogether.

Fake Google PR example

There will always be people who are looking for opportunities to profit from other people’s lack of knowledge and experience and the SEO field is no exception. I have noticed recently several Google Adwords content ads and other sites promoting these scum bags selling fake PR text links. I have just found a new ad promising a PR6 link on iWebTool’s Page Rank Prediction page, how ironic is this. Well, it’s not really ironic at all, if you think about it a little bit. Where do you find the best audience for this type of services? Of course on sites that put together a few simple scripts to check PageRank or predict future PageRank.

Here is our innocent looking ad promising a PR 6 link for $19 a year. A deal really, if the PageRank was real.

Fake page rank advertiser

The site behind the ad is http://www.spaceadvocate.com/. The site could be gone by the time you read this, so I have created a screen shot.

fake-google-page-rank-example.jpg

Here is the screen shot from the Google cache command cache:http://www.spaceadvocate.com/. As you can see Google knows nothing about this page. In other cases you may find a page that is indexed by Google, but it will be different from the original one.

fake-google-page-rank-example-cache.jpg

Here is a Google search that may turn up a few more fake PageRank sellers. These are typical template based sites so it’s easy to find “foot prints” left behind by PageRank fakers. Consider yourself being warned, the PR fakers are out there.


Technorati : , , , ,

Add this blog post to: Add this link to your Delicious accountdel.icio.us Digg this storyDigg this Add this link to your Google accountAdd to Google

Search engine optimization pricing

 February 8, 2008   Comments: 0

16267234_thb.jpg

SEO is one of many markets where getting some straight answers on how much a particular service is worth is hard to find. What is a reasonable fee SEOs should charge for getting your site to the top 10 results on Google for example? While most SEO companies prefer to charge monthly maintenance contract fees or large setup fees initially and a small monthly fee, in our opinion measurable results speak louder than well polished monthly status reports. Once you talk to a few reputable SEO companies and request a quote, you will see wildly different search engine optimization pricing and contract terms. Sometimes the total costs can vary by as much 50%-10,000%. How is an average website owner supposed to make sense of all the pricing options and SEO guarantees?

Well, let’s start with some fundamentals about how SEO company’s determine pricing for their SEO services

  1. Most SEOs will spend some time analyzing your site and come with a keyword list of about 5 to 10 target phrases unless you already have a specific keyword list.
  2. They will check your site’s age, ranking, Google PageRank and current link popularity.
  3. They will take a look the competition and the search engine results landscape for the chosen keywords. They will get answers to things like how old the sites are in the top 10 results, how many back links they have, what’s the average Google PageRank of the top 10-20 sites and many other important metrics.
  4. Next they will determine if the target keywords has low competition, moderate competition, or very high competition. They will use the keywords in quotes, enter the Google search commands for checking anchor text competition (allinanchor) and title tag competition (allintitle).

Based on where your site currently ranks in the search results can have a very important affect on the SEO pricing. Lifting a website to the first page results of Google from say number 500 is a lot tougher than moving it from the 50th position to the top 10.

As a webmaster paying for SEO services you only care about seeing your site in the top 10 and not so much about how your site gets there, but from a search engine optimization company’s perspective it’s very important to take into consideration all the above variables.

Still, there are some guidelines you should use in gauging whether or not your are over paying for SEO services. One very telling research method is running the Google Traffic Estimator Tool using your target keywords. We believe in letting the pay-per-click market determine how much you should pay for SEO services. Here is a quick example. Using the Google Traffic Estimator Tool take a look at the results for the keyword “golf shoes”. What you will notice is that this keyword can cost Google Adwords advertisers between $720 - $1,200 a day to be in the number 1 to 2 in the sponsored results. Let’s take the low end of the spectrum and multiply 30 days X $720 = $21,600 a month in advertising costs just for this one keyword. So how much a SEO should charge for getting a natural top 10 ranking on Google for this keyword? How about $259,200?

By doing some home work with the Google Traffic Estimator Tool and taking a look at the exact phrase competition for “golf shoes” on Google you would be a lot better equipped to sort out who can offer you the best SEO services and pricing.


Technorati : ,

Add this blog post to: Add this link to your Delicious accountdel.icio.us Digg this storyDigg this Add this link to your Google accountAdd to Google

An eye for effective SEO

 February 3, 2008   Comments: 0

38063864_thb.jpg

People tend to forget that behind every visit to your site there is a human being and whether you like it or not they will form their own opinion of your website in just 10-15 seconds. I know I can spot a real gem when I see one on any subject matter. Since my work involves a lot of research of some type, finding information fast is crucial to what I do. Every site has a certain characteristics that tells you within the first few second if you are on the right place or just wasting your time. I don’t know how many times a day I hit the back button on my browser window to bail out of sites that offer nothing useful or it’s not the answer I am looking for.

Is it the fault of the search engines that they didn’t pull out of their billion page index the 10 best sites that match my query? I would like to blame Google for missed hits and irrelevant search results, but than again what am I thinking, Google is just a bunch of networked supper computers that are as the dumb as my kitchen table without the search logic that’s built into them.

So, despite the best search algorithms Google, Yahoo and MSN will miss the boat more often than not.

As SEOs we see our job as gently nudging the search engines in the directions of our clients sites for the keywords they want to be on the first page for. The real trick of SEO is to figure our which one of the 100 or so factors Google will give the most weight to, and concentrating our efforts on those.

Our guaranteed SEO relies on the past experiences to gauge which link popularity or on page SEO tweaks will give us the biggest bang for the buck. Since we only get paid if actually push our SEO clients’ site to the top 10 on Google we can’t waste our resources on techniques that only achieve marginal results.

From our experience so far this is what works for sites on Google that are on the second page of the SERPs or lower for moderately competitive keywords, that’s about 100,000 result or less for the exact keyword phrase (meaning keywords in quotes like this “seo software”).

Content Optimization:

  1. Create unique title tags for each page and match title with the content’s target keyword phrases
  2. Review and optimize the internal linking scheme and current anchor texts
  3. Add a site map if it’s missing
  4. Encourage the owner of the set up a blog
  5. Update the existing content with some fresh new pages and link to them

Link Building:

  1. Write at least 2-3 new articles and distribute them to the top 5 ezine sites. You should consider Ezinearticles.com, Articlecity.com and Articlealley.com
  2. Add the site to DMOZ.org and the Yahoo directory if not already listed. The Yahoo listing is pricey at $299 per year, but well worth it.
  3. Find 5-10 niche or regional directories that matches the site’s content and submit. Submission costs range from Free to $200 per listing.
  4. Buy/Secure 20-40 new one-way permanent links from sites with a minimum of PR 3 that are least 50% related. Expect to pay $15-$25 for each link.
  5. Buy/Secure 5 top quality permanent links from authority domains that are closely related to the target site. Expect to pay $300-$500 per link.

Of course keep in mind there are always exceptions and a great deal depends on the keywords’ competitiveness. If you have done any SEO, you should already know there is a big difference between lifting a site to the top from say number 100 on Google for a keyword phrase like “home loans” vs. “Florida term life insurance”.

Add this blog post to: Add this link to your Delicious accountdel.icio.us Digg this storyDigg this Add this link to your Google accountAdd to Google

Learn SEO the Easy Way with Spoon-Fed SEO for GrownUps

 August 31, 2007   Comments: 0

We are pleased to announce the release of our mini beginner SEO guide called “Spoon-Fed SEO for GrownUps”. We decided to go with this tounge in cheek title as it emphasizes the complexities inherent in search engine marketing. Most people new to internet marketing have no idea what search engines are about or how they even earn a profit online.

After talking to many of our new SEO clients and SEO users there was a need for something that ties everything together nicely from A to Z in the SEO world. We have focused a bit on how to make good use of the SEO Studio tools to help webmasters speed up some mundane repetitive tasks in search engine optimization such as rank checking, back link analysis. Seasoned SEOs know 80% of all SEO efforts is connected with some type of external popularity building whether it’s link building through directory submissions, link buying, article distribution or viral marketing. This is where we feel new webmasters need the most help and we hope our SEO guide won’t disappoint you.

Learn SEO the easy way. Download or read online Spoon-Fed SEO for GrownUps

Add this blog post to: Add this link to your Delicious accountdel.icio.us Digg this storyDigg this Add this link to your Google accountAdd to Google

Google bomb is neutralized, the world is safe again

 January 26, 2007   Comments: 0

Google apparently defused the infamous Google Bomb with one sleek algorithm change according to Matt Cutts. “So a few of us who work here got together and came up with an algorithm that minimizes the impact of many Googlebombs.” I am afraid this may not be the end of it.
There are so many folks out there with way too much time on their hand, who want nothing more than to embarrass Google, or prove that their systems is full of flaws. I can’t claim I have a lot of time on my hand, but I could bring up at least a dozen examples where their newly developed system to catch Google bombs is still not working.
All it takes is just a little wordplay and I had already found one keyword phrase for which Google itself ranks on top, it’s “do evil company”. Algorithm tinkering can only go so far, and I am sure Matt knows this as well, but plugging a few obvious wholes in their ranking technology is better than not doing anything at all. At least they have now created the appearance they have worked on this notorious problem which has taken on a life of its own after miserable failure became a household name even in places where people never even heard of search engines.
Add this blog post to: Add this link to your Delicious accountdel.icio.us Digg this storyDigg this Add this link to your Google accountAdd to Google

Google image search gets a facelift, but not for the better

 January 25, 2007   Comments: 0

Google image search gets a facelift, but not for the better I don’t know about you, but I liked the layout of the previous image search better on Google.
Now, there is a lot less information visible about the source, image dimensions and size when the search results are loaded initially. You have to do some mousing around to find all the information you were automatically presented with before. To me, this is a backward step and a complete opposite to Google philosophy striving for the ultimate “user experience”.
We’ll have to wait and see how they respond to user complaints if there are any. I can’t be the only one hating this new image search interface, or am I?
Add this blog post to: Add this link to your Delicious accountdel.icio.us Digg this storyDigg this Add this link to your Google accountAdd to Google

Google is chocking the Internet

 January 24, 2007   Comments: 0

A bunch of wireless outfits and major telcos are crying the blues over Google’s unfair advantage in the search and ad market place and its domination of their networks. This is all part of the opposition to the new net neutrality legislation that has some major foes including Verizon. William Barr, Verizon's General Counsel. According to David Isenberg’s notes on Verizon official position on net neutrality “Google doesn't want to compete”.
As far as I can tell, all of the telcos and wireless companies providing internet access, music downloads and a whole bunch of other services riding on the backs of the TCP/IP protocol. TCP/IP was developed by the Department of Defense without any contribution from the opponents of this legislation, yet they use the technology freely without paying any royalties either to the tax payers or the Department of Defense. Of course they casually forget to mention this minor detail when they blast Google for using their bandwidth to generate ad revenues.

The bottom line is, the telcos and wireless companies are up against a formidable opponent in Google and they know it, so they have been trying to defeat the legislation through political back door maneuvering to twist the arms of congressman and senators to stop the Network neutrality legislation, I’d say stick it to them Google.

Add this blog post to: Add this link to your Delicious accountdel.icio.us Digg this storyDigg this Add this link to your Google accountAdd to Google

Nielsen NetRatings Releases September U.S. Search Share Rankings

 November 20, 2006   Comments: 0

Check out the latest search market share results (PDF) published by Nielsen//NetRatings for September 2006. Google is leading by a very comfortable lead, no surprise there, but what about MSN?

It seems Microsoft can’t mount a successful counter attack against Google, no matter what they do. We have to wait to see if the launch of Windows live made any difference in their market share when the new search results are published.

 

Example: An estimated 3.0 billion search queries were conducted at Google Search, representing 50 percent of all search queries conducted during the given time period. Please take note, these searches also include image, news and even map searches.

Add this blog post to: Add this link to your Delicious accountdel.icio.us Digg this storyDigg this Add this link to your Google accountAdd to Google

Getting out of Google’s supplemental index

 November 13, 2006   Comments: 0

I had written an article for those who are in Google's Supplemental index hell and what they can do to get out of it.
"Are you one of those webmasters who’s got caught in Google’s supplemental indexing hell recently? It seems in the past few months in September and October especially, more and more websites are getting trashed and dumped in Google’s supplemental index. The question asked by most of those who are affected by this Google algorithmic filter is how their sites ended up in there in the first place, and how to get out Google’s supplemental index…" Read more
Add this blog post to: Add this link to your Delicious accountdel.icio.us Digg this storyDigg this Add this link to your Google accountAdd to Google
Next Page »
WordPress database error You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near '' at line 1 for query SELECT cat_id, cat_name FROM